Orthopaedic PG thesis topics offer MS and DNB Orthopaedics students an enormous range of research opportunities — from high-volume trauma and fracture surgery to complex joint replacement, spine, sports medicine, and paediatric orthopaedics. India's high burden of road traffic injuries, osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, and a rapidly growing arthroplasty workload means that most orthopaedic units have abundant case material for a well-designed prospective thesis study.

1Why Orthopaedic Research Matters in 2026

Musculoskeletal conditions are the second leading cause of disability worldwide, and India faces a particularly acute burden. Road traffic accidents generate thousands of fracture cases annually at major trauma centres. Osteoarthritis is rising in prevalence with an ageing and increasingly overweight population, driving exponential growth in joint replacement surgery. Spinal disorders, sports injuries, congenital deformities, and bone infections add further to the orthopaedic research landscape.

Orthopaedic research is ideally suited to comparative surgical studies — two implants, two approaches, two fixation techniques — with clear, validated outcome measures such as functional scores (DASH, Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC, NDI), radiographic parameters (union rate, alignment), and complication rates. These studies are feasible within a 3-year MS residency when the unit has adequate case volume. Choosing the right topic early, verifying case numbers in the OT register, and obtaining IEC approval promptly are the three critical first steps.

💡 Feasibility Tip

MS Orthopaedics students should check their hospital's fracture and OT register for the past 2 years before finalising a topic. Fracture and trauma topics will have the highest case volumes at most Indian orthopaedic units.

2Fractures & Trauma Thesis Topics (1–20)

  1. Intertrochanteric femur fracture: proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) vs dynamic hip screw (DHS) — functional outcomes and implant failure
  2. Neck of femur fracture in elderly: hemiarthroplasty vs total hip replacement — functional outcome and revision rate
  3. Distal radius fracture: volar locking plate vs closed reduction and cast — DASH score, radiographic alignment, and complications
  4. Tibial shaft fracture: intramedullary nailing vs minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) — union rate and complications
  5. Compound fractures (Gustilo-Anderson classification): primary vs delayed closure — infection rate and union outcomes
  6. Calcaneum fracture: operative vs non-operative management — Bohler's angle restoration and functional outcome
  7. Floating knee injury: ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures — management challenges and outcome
  8. Supracondylar femur fracture: retrograde IMN vs locking condylar plate — union, alignment, and knee function
  9. Pilon fracture: staged protocol (spanning external fixator + ORIF) vs primary ORIF — wound complication and functional outcome
  10. Proximal humerus fracture: ORIF vs hemiarthroplasty vs conservative — Constant-Murley score at 1 year
  11. Acetabular fracture: surgical approaches and 2-year functional outcome using Merle d'Aubigné score
  12. Pelvic ring injury: external fixation vs internal fixation — reduction quality, blood loss, and functional outcome
  13. Clavicle fracture: operative vs conservative management — Constant score, non-union rate, and return to activity
  14. Ankle fracture: tension band wiring vs plate fixation for lateral malleolus — AOFAS score and complication rate
  15. Subtrochanteric femur fracture: cephalomedullary nail vs blade plate — technical difficulty, union, and implant failure
  16. Pathological fracture: aetiology, surgical stabilisation technique, and functional outcome
  17. Polytrauma with long bone fractures: damage control orthopaedics vs early total care — outcome comparison
  18. Non-union of long bone fractures: aetiology, classification, and outcomes after exchange nailing or bone grafting
  19. Malunion correction: osteotomy techniques, outcome measures, and patient satisfaction
  20. Fracture-related infection (FRI): diagnostic criteria, debridement protocol, and infection eradication rates
🦴 Need Help?

Need guidance selecting your MS Orthopaedics thesis topic?

Get FREE expert guidance on topic selection and synopsis writing for MS/DNB Orthopaedics. Experts reply within 2 hours!

🔒 100% Confidential · No Spam

3Joint Replacement Thesis Topics (21–40)

  1. Total knee replacement: cemented vs cementless fixation — 5-year implant survival and functional outcomes
  2. Unicompartmental knee replacement vs total knee replacement: WOMAC score, complication, and revision rates
  3. Total hip replacement: posterior vs anterolateral approach — dislocation rate, Oxford Hip Score, and recovery time
  4. Minimally invasive TKR: blood loss, hospital stay, and functional outcome vs standard TKR
  5. Computer-assisted TKR: limb alignment accuracy and Oxford Knee Score vs conventional TKR
  6. Robotic-assisted TKR: component positioning accuracy and short-term functional outcomes
  7. TKR in patients with pre-existing deformity (valgus/varus >15°): alignment correction and functional outcomes
  8. Thromboprophylaxis after TKR/THR: LMWH vs aspirin — DVT incidence, bleeding risk, and compliance
  9. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): two-stage revision outcomes — infection eradication rate and functional outcome
  10. Aseptic loosening after TKR: revision surgery technique and functional outcomes
  11. Shoulder arthroplasty: anatomic vs reverse total shoulder replacement — Constant score and complication rates
  12. Total ankle replacement: AOFAS score, implant survival, and complication rates at 2 years
  13. Hip resurfacing vs total hip replacement in young patients: activity levels, implant survival, and revision rates
  14. Bilateral simultaneous vs staged TKR: blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and outcome
  15. Enhanced recovery after arthroplasty (ERAS): length of stay, pain control, and patient satisfaction
  16. Tranexamic acid in TKR/THR: blood loss reduction, transfusion avoidance, and thromboembolic risk
  17. Knee arthroplasty in obese patients (BMI >35): complication rate, functional outcomes, and implant survival
  18. Patellar resurfacing in TKR: anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, and revision rate
  19. Revision TKR: indication, technical challenges, and functional outcomes using KSSS
  20. Patient-reported outcomes after TKR: VAS pain, Oxford Knee Score, and WOMAC at 6 and 12 months

4Spine Surgery Thesis Topics (41–55)

  1. Lumbar disc herniation: microdiscectomy vs tubular discectomy — VAS, ODI, and complication rates
  2. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: TLIF vs PLIF — fusion rate, VAS, and 2-year functional outcomes
  3. Lumbar spinal stenosis: decompression alone vs decompression + fusion — ODI and VAS at 1 year
  4. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: ACDF vs laminoplasty — JOA score improvement and complication rates
  5. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: vertebroplasty vs kyphoplasty — pain relief and height restoration
  6. Spinal tuberculosis: anterior vs posterior surgery — kyphosis correction, neurological recovery, and fusion rate
  7. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior spinal fusion outcomes — Cobb angle correction and SRS-22 score
  8. Adult degenerative scoliosis: surgical correction outcomes — sagittal balance, ODI, and complication rates
  9. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: conservative vs surgical treatment — pain, neurological recovery, and recurrence
  10. Cervical disc arthroplasty vs ACDF: adjacent segment disease rate and VAS at 2 years
  11. Minimally invasive TLIF vs open TLIF: blood loss, hospital stay, radiation exposure, and functional outcomes
  12. Cauda equina syndrome: timing of decompression and bladder/bowel recovery outcomes
  13. Spinal cord injury: ASIA grade, surgical timing, and motor recovery at 6 months
  14. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: diagnostic workup, injection therapy, and surgical fusion outcomes
  15. Post-laminectomy syndrome: revision surgery vs spinal cord stimulation — pain and functional outcomes
📋 Synopsis Help

Struggling with your MS Orthopaedics thesis synopsis?

PubMedico writes complete synopses for MS/DNB Orthopaedics students — IEC-ready with sample size and methodology.

  • ✓ Free synopsis review (worth ₹2000)
  • ✓ Response in 2 hours
  • ✓ No advance payment

🔒 100% Secure & Confidential

5Sports Medicine & Arthroscopy Thesis Topics (56–70)

  1. ACL reconstruction: patellar tendon vs hamstring graft — Lysholm score, pivot shift test, and re-rupture rate
  2. ACL reconstruction: single-bundle vs double-bundle technique — rotational stability and functional outcomes
  3. Meniscal tear: arthroscopic repair vs partial meniscectomy — Lysholm score, pain, and osteoarthritis progression
  4. Rotator cuff tear: arthroscopic repair vs open repair — Constant score, re-tear rate, and patient satisfaction
  5. Shoulder instability: arthroscopic Bankart repair vs open Latarjet — recurrence rate and functional outcomes
  6. Patellar instability: MPFL reconstruction technique, trochlear morphology (Dejour type), and recurrence
  7. Meniscal allograft transplantation: joint space preservation, pain outcomes, and return to sport
  8. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs corticosteroid injection in rotator cuff tendinopathy: VAS pain and DASH at 3 months
  9. Achilles tendon rupture: operative vs non-operative management — re-rupture rate and return to sport
  10. Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: Brostrom vs anatomic reconstruction — AOFAS score and recurrence
  11. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): labral repair outcomes, HOS score, and re-operation rate
  12. Osteochondral lesion of the talus: arthroscopic debridement vs microfracture vs OAT — AOFAS outcomes
  13. Elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction in throwing athletes: UCL repair vs Tommy John — return to sport
  14. Biceps tendon rupture at elbow: surgical reattachment — DASH score, supination strength, and complication
  15. Sports hernia (athletic pubalgia): conservative vs surgical repair — return to sport and recurrence rates

6Paediatric Orthopaedics Thesis Topics (71–85)

  1. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH): Pavlik harness success rate by age at diagnosis and Graf type
  2. Perthes disease: Herring classification, surgical vs non-surgical management, and radiological outcome at skeletal maturity
  3. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE): in-situ pinning vs reduction — AVN rate and functional outcome
  4. Supracondylar humerus fracture in children: closed reduction + K-wire vs open reduction — cubitus varus and nerve injury
  5. Lateral condyle fracture of the humerus: fixation technique, union rate, and cubitus valgus development
  6. Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV): Ponseti method casting success rate and relapse at 2 years
  7. Cerebral palsy: orthopaedic surgical interventions — gait analysis outcomes and GMFCS level changes
  8. Limb length discrepancy: aetiology, epiphysiodesis timing, and limb equalisation outcomes
  9. Blount's disease: tibial osteotomy outcomes — mechanical axis correction and recurrence
  10. Osteogenesis imperfecta: intramedullary rodding — fracture rate reduction and mobility outcomes
  11. Septic arthritis in children: joint aspiration vs arthroscopic washout — time to fever resolution and functional outcome
  12. Acute haematogenous osteomyelitis: conservative vs surgical management — treatment duration and recurrence
  13. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: brace treatment compliance and curve progression at skeletal maturity
  14. Congenital scoliosis: hemivertebra excision outcomes — Cobb angle correction and complication rates
  15. Paediatric forearm fractures: closed reduction + cast vs elastic stable intramedullary nailing — re-displacement and functional outcome

7Infections, Tumors & Miscellaneous Topics (86–100)

  1. Chronic osteomyelitis: Cierny-Mader classification, debridement + antibiotic bead/spacer, and infection eradication rate
  2. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: conservative vs surgical management — limb salvage rate and recurrence
  3. Septic arthritis in adults: arthroscopic washout vs repeated aspiration — time to resolution and joint function
  4. Bone and soft tissue tumours: clinical profile, staging (Enneking), wide excision margins, and local recurrence
  5. Giant cell tumour of bone: curettage + bone grafting vs cementation — local recurrence and functional outcome
  6. Osteosarcoma: neoadjuvant chemotherapy response (Huvos grading), limb salvage vs amputation, and 5-year survival
  7. Chondrosarcoma: surgical margins, histological grade, and local recurrence at 3 years
  8. Ewing's sarcoma: multimodal treatment outcomes and survival in an Indian cohort
  9. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Ficat staging, core decompression vs THR — progression rate and functional outcome
  10. Dupuytren's contracture: fasciotomy vs fasciectomy vs collagenase injection — recurrence and functional outcome
  11. Carpal tunnel syndrome: open vs endoscopic release — symptom relief, grip strength, and return to work
  12. Trigger finger: steroid injection vs surgical release — resolution rate, recurrence, and complications
  13. Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: surgical reconstruction outcomes — pain, function, and deformity correction
  14. Bone graft substitutes vs autograft in orthopaedic surgery: union rate comparison and donor site morbidity
  15. 3D-printed patient-specific implants in complex orthopaedic reconstruction: accuracy, functional outcome, and cost analysis
💡 Pro Tip for MS Orthopaedics Students

MS Orthopaedics students should check their hospital's fracture register and OT records for the past 2 years before finalising a topic. Fracture and trauma topics will have the highest case volumes; joint replacement and spine topics are excellent for units with a high elective workload.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to common questions about MS/DNB Orthopaedics thesis topics

Which is the best MS Orthopaedics thesis topic for 2026?+

High-impact areas in 2026 include minimally invasive fracture fixation, computer-assisted and robotic arthroplasty, ACL reconstruction technique comparisons, and periprosthetic joint infection management. Choose a topic where your unit performs at least 50–80 relevant procedures per year — fracture and trauma topics will have the highest volumes at most Indian orthopaedic units.

What study design is best for an orthopaedic thesis?+

Prospective comparative cohort studies comparing two surgical techniques or implants are the most highly valued by examiners. Randomised controlled trials are the gold standard but are difficult to complete within a 3-year residency. Retrospective audits are acceptable for rare conditions, non-union series, or tumour outcome studies.

How many patients do I need for an MS Orthopaedics thesis?+

For comparative studies (two fixation techniques or implants), 40–60 patients per group is standard. For descriptive outcome studies (e.g., complication profile of a procedure), 80–100 cases are sufficient. Always calculate sample size formally using OpenEpi or G*Power — the IEC requires this in the synopsis.

What ethical approval is needed for orthopaedic research?+

All MS/DNB theses require Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval before patient enrolment begins. Studies comparing two standard-of-care surgical techniques require approval as prospective comparative studies. Informed consent must be obtained from all patients and documented in their records. For paediatric research, parental consent is mandatory.

What statistical tests are most used in orthopaedic research?+

The most common tests are independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U (continuous outcome comparison between two groups), Chi-square or Fisher's exact (categorical outcomes such as complication rates), paired t-test or Wilcoxon (pre-post functional scores), Kaplan-Meier (implant survival), and logistic regression (predictors of complications or failure).

Can PubMedico help write my MS Orthopaedics thesis synopsis?+

Yes — PubMedico provides complete synopsis writing support for MS and DNB Orthopaedics students, including topic finalisation, literature review, methodology, sample size calculation, and IEC-ready formatting. WhatsApp: +91 96642 99381 for a free consultation.